{"id":12372,"date":"2025-06-20T13:06:49","date_gmt":"2025-06-20T13:06:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/?p=12372"},"modified":"2025-06-20T13:06:49","modified_gmt":"2025-06-20T13:06:49","slug":"cronica-de-carte-in-lucru-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/20\/cronica-de-carte-in-lucru-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Cronic\u0103 de carte (\u00een lucru)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Demersul critic al lui Bogdan Mihai Dasc\u0103lu, consacrat revaloriz\u0103rii operei poetice a lui Anghel Dumbr\u0103veanu, dob\u00e2nde\u0219te o nou\u0103 amplitudine \u0219i o mai ferm\u0103 consisten\u021b\u0103 odat\u0103 cu apari\u021bia celui de-al doilea volum, intitulat <em>Anghel Dumbr\u0103veanu SCRIERI II. Publicistic\u0103 literar\u0103. Coresponden\u021b\u0103 (1973-1978).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">R\u0103m\u00e2ne \u00een seama istoriei literare \u2014 acea instan\u021b\u0103 ce dicteaz\u0103 cu rigoare \u0219i \u00een\u021beleapt\u0103 pruden\u021b\u0103 \u00een chestiuni de durabilitate artistic\u0103 \u2014 s\u0103 stabileasc\u0103 locul ce i se cuvine lui Anghel Dumbr\u0103veanu \u00een arhitectura valorilor poeziei rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti contemporane. Orice tentativ\u0103 de evaluare a operei sale trebuie, cel pu\u021bin \u00een stadiul actual al recept\u0103rii, s\u0103 porneasc\u0103 de la faptul c\u0103 accesul nostru se limiteaz\u0103, \u00een mod firesc, la latura ei poetic\u0103, a c\u0103rei expresie s-a coagulat \u00een numeroase volume publicate de-a lungul anilor. \u00centr-un context cultural \u00een care textele diseminate \u00een periodice \u2014 fie ele literare, fie de alt\u0103 natur\u0103 \u2014 sunt adesea ignorate de exegeza curent\u0103, edi\u021bia de fa\u021b\u0103 dob\u00e2nde\u0219te o valoare incontestabil\u0103, \u00eentruc\u00e2t reune\u0219te aceste fragmente risipite, conferindu-le o form\u0103 unitar\u0103 \u0219i oferindu-le, astfel, lectorului de bun\u0103-credin\u021b\u0103 \u2014 pe care \u00eel presupunem \u00eenc\u0103 interesat \u2014 \u00eenlesnirea unui contact direct, nemijlocit, cu o parte a operei r\u0103mas\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 acum \u00eentr-o relativ\u0103 penumbr\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen preg\u0103tirea edi\u021biei <em>Anghel Dumbr\u0103veanu, Scrieri<\/em> \u2014 conceput\u0103 s\u0103 reuneasc\u0103 paginile risipite prin reviste, r\u0103mase \u00een afara volumelor tip\u0103rite \u2014 Bogdan Mihai Dasc\u0103lu a procedat, dup\u0103 cum el \u00eensu\u0219i afirm\u0103, la o prim\u0103 ordonare tematic\u0103 a materialului: publicistic\u0103 literar\u0103, texte confesive, traduceri, \u00eensemn\u0103ri de c\u0103l\u0103torie: \u201eA fost un \u00eenceput necesar, dar nu \u0219i suficient. C\u0103ci, la cap\u0103tul acestei clasific\u0103ri, am constatat cu o u\u0219oar\u0103 nedumerire c\u0103 r\u0103m\u0103seser\u0103 deoparte nu pu\u021bine texte, greu de subsumat unor categorii riguroase, dar care se apropiau \u2014 ca ton \u0219i structur\u0103 \u2014 de ceea ce tradi\u021bional se nume\u0219te <em>Po\u0219ta redac\u021biei<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Demersul critic al lui Bogdan Mihai Dasc\u0103lu, consacrat revaloriz\u0103rii operei poetice a lui Anghel Dumbr\u0103veanu, dob\u00e2nde\u0219te o nou\u0103 amplitudine \u0219i o mai ferm\u0103 consisten\u021b\u0103 odat\u0103 cu apari\u021bia celui de-al doilea volum, intitulat Anghel Dumbr\u0103veanu SCRIERI II. Publicistic\u0103 literar\u0103. Coresponden\u021b\u0103 (1973-1978). R\u0103m\u00e2ne \u00een seama istoriei literare \u2014 acea instan\u021b\u0103 ce dicteaz\u0103 cu rigoare \u0219i \u00een\u021beleapt\u0103 pruden\u021b\u0103 &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/20\/cronica-de-carte-in-lucru-21\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continu\u0103 lectura <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Cronic\u0103 de carte (\u00een lucru)<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12373,"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12372\/revisions\/12373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.revistaderecenzii.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}